Get Started
Get Inspiration
Groups
Events
Ideas
Release Hub

Start a Post
Log in

Docusign Momentum 2026 | New York City

(Wed, May 20, 12:00 PM)

Home
Ideas

Ideas

Want to shape the future of Docusign? Add your ideas for dream features and upvote others you love.

Featured topics

How to Use the Ideas Feature

What you need to know about Docusign Community IdeasThis guide will walk you through the process of sharing your ideas, voting on existing ideas, and...

D

Forum|Forum|1 year ago

19370

Update on the status of submitted ideas

Hi everyone! We’ve heard your questions about the status of submitted ideas in the Ideas forum.Internally, the Docusign team is actively reviewing you...

Forum|Forum|10 months ago

4615

Filter by Idea status

Filter by category

803 Ideas

Newest First

Most Replies

Most Votes

D

doryNew Voice

Créer une arborescence pour les champs paratgésIdea Submitted

Bonjour, Pouvez vous donner la possibilité de créer une arborescence avec des noms de répertoires pour ranger les champs personnalisés dans le cadre de partage ? en fait différents services au sein d’une société intervient et n’utilise pas le même champs et cela devient tres vite fastidieux de trouver ses propres champs.

0

D

Forum|Forum|2 hours ago

E

erikolin87Newcomer

Request to Completed AgreeementsIdea Submitted

Please connect the request to a completed agreement. The idea is that you can audit the approval trail.

0

E

Forum|Forum|7 hours ago

J

John.FairbankNewcomer

Delegation LimitationsIdea Submitted

I don’t see any reason why delegations only apply to those assigned the “Needs to Sign” action. It should apply to those assigned the “Allowed to Edit” and other actions as well. Currently we have many envelopes stuck in the queue of an employee currently on vacation, and the only remedy is for the originator to retract and modify the approval path or for all templates to be updated every time that person goes on vacation, both of which are very inefficient.

0

J

Forum|Forum|15 hours ago

L

ljelliottNewcomer

Initiators don't receive declination emailsIdea Submitted

There isn’t currently a way to have initiator of a public web form receive decline notifications. The notification will always go to the sender (the account holder who authorized the web form). This is a current limitation of public web forms. Our only workaround is for the template creator to have to forward all declination emails to the sender which defeats the purpose of automation for this. The only alternative we were advised is to change to use as a sender-initiated webform. which would require us to email the form directly to the recipient’s email, and they will receive all relevant notifications. Currently, our organization is processing dozens of forms via this Webform link and it’s not possible to send the form to each person to complete. This is a major limitation of the public webform.

0

L

Forum|Forum|16 hours ago

M

MaalibNewcomer

List of user who connected without SSOIdea Submitted

Hello,We would like to have a visibility of users that were connecting to your acccount without going through the SSO (connecting via their password). We would like to enforce SSO connection for all users.Kind Regards,Aliou BAH

0

M

Forum|Forum|23 hours ago

P

PrasanDeAlwisNew Voice

Request to Increase Comment Character Limit in “Assign to Someone Else” OptionIdea Submitted

Hi Team,When accessing the eSignature signing process, users have the option to select “Assign to Someone Else” instead of signing.This allows users to enter the following information:New signer’s nameNew signer’s email addressComment (up to 250 characters)We have observed that the 250-character limit for the comment field restricts the amount of information that can be provided when reassigning the document. Our business requests to increase the character limit for comments. Could you please increase this character limit in future enhancement?

0

P

Forum|Forum|1 day ago

P

PrasanDeAlwisNew Voice

Restrict Access to Edit Recipients Page Before Sending Envelope AgreementsIdea Submitted

Hi Team,Is there a way to prevent users from accessing the Edit Recipients page before sending an agreement? I have attached several screenshots highlighting the sections I am referring to.Currently, business users are able to access the Edit Recipients page and modify the signing type or change the signing order. In some cases, users enter incorrect signing order numbers or forget to update them properly, which impacts our agreement status mapping.We specifically need to restrict users from accessing the Edit Recipients section on the final page when sending agreements for signature.is it possible to control this behavior through permission sets as an enhancement? This will help us lot control Docusign process properly.

0

P

Forum|Forum|1 day ago

É

Émilin Dreher de LimaNew Voice

Selection of authorship, review, or approval in the Part 11 ModuleParked

During system validation testing of DocuSign, we observed that a single signer is able to select different roles within the same document. In other words, when the signer has more than one signature field in the document, they can choose to act as "author," "reviewer," and "approver" using the Part 11 Module. I suggest adjusting the module configuration so that once a role (authorship, review, or approval) has been selected, the same signer cannot select another role within the same document. Additionally, we opened a support ticket (16067933), and the feedback received indicated that this configuration is currently not possible. The recommendation was to submit an idea (improvement opportunity) through the platform.

4

É

Forum|Forum|1 day ago

K

KDi_EA_TaxNewcomer

Bulk signature in one click of multiple documentsIdea Submitted

Hi Team,As advised in your reply to support case 17167673, it would be greatly appreciated if you could consider a future enhancement: a bulk send feature that allows one or multiple individuals to sign multiple documents in a single click.Thank you in advance.Katarina

0

K

Forum|Forum|2 days ago

C

cbilgerNewcomer

Copy/Clone within Document Template New SectionIdea Submitted

It would be great if Docusign added the ability to clone or copy and template within the Document Template New section. It currently does not have that feature.

0

C

Forum|Forum|3 days ago

D

daniel.krcmarTroubleshooter

Admin-Level Automatic Delegation / Redirect for EnvelopesDuplicate

ProblemThere is no single admin-level control to automatically redirect all envelopes addressed to a specific user (e.g., when someone leaves the company or changes roles).Admins must rely on a mix of:Delegated Signing (user-level, manual setup) Custody Transfer Rules (post-creation workaround) Template updates (often complex and time-consuming)This creates operational overhead and risk of envelopes getting stuck.Proposed SolutionIntroduce an admin-level “Auto-Redirect / Delegation Rule” that:Automatically reroutes all new incoming envelopes for a selected user to a designated delegate Works regardless of whether the user is a recipient or sender Applies globally (across templates, PowerForms, API integrations) Can be set with start/end dates or indefinitelyKey BenefitsEliminates dependency on user-level delegation setup Avoids editing large numbers of templates Prevents envelope delivery failures when accounts are deactivated Simplifies offboarding and role transitions Reduces admin workload and operational riskCurrent Workarounds (Not Ideal)Delegated Signing requires user login/setup Custody Transfer Rules only act after envelope creation Template ownership updates are manual and error-prone

2

J

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

J

JmaierVTAActive Voice

Admin Visibility into User's Signing DelegatesIdea Submitted

One of the most common asks that I get from Executive Secretaries and support staff is to configure a signing delegate on someone’s behalf. Oftentimes, this request comes while said user is out of the office, but a signature delegate has been set up via the business process owner via a delegation memo. We’ve increased our outreach in this regard to prevent this, but it would ultimately be very beneficial for admins to have visibility and control over signature delegates.

4

J

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

F

frnkieNewcomer

Enhancement to Automatching Template FeatureIdea Submitted

I’m addressing the current limitation caused by the template containing more pages than the uploaded document, which prevents proper matching. I understand that the limitation is due to the template having more pages than the uploaded document, which prevents a match. However, it would be extremely helpful if the matching logic could be enhanced to consider other factors—such as matching based on template/document names or enabling matching based on Autoplace tags only, regardless of page count.

1

J

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

C

cturcotteNewcomer

Allow Administrators to access "View Details" for envelopes sent in a workflow.Idea Submitted

Currently we have set up a Workflow, and this workflow sends an envelope using the creator as it’s sender. This means with ID Verification and Liveness, only the envelope sender can access or download the Liveness Selfie video. If you have multiple people who will be verifying the documents that come in, having only one person be able to access that piece is hindering. There should be a way to configure Admins or Other Users to be able to View Details based off of the workflow or template used sending an envelope. Since the workflow is accessed from a link, it is not being specifically sent by one user like a traditional envelope.

1

J

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

S

scarter_wyoNewcomer

Provide Void, Resend, Correct buttons on Docusign Status records in Salesforce like Legacy had.Idea Submitted

Legacy provides Resend DocuSign Email, Correct in DocuSign, Void Envelope buttons on the DocuSign Status record. Our users use these features often. The new DAL Docusign Envelope Status component also provides these options; however, the component is limited to working with only 5 documents, and it does not provide the name of the email subject. Our users do not know which document they are working with when selecting the buttons. We often have 6-8 documents that we are waiting for signatures on that are related to one opportunity. If a user needs to Void or Resend the 6th, or 7th document, they cannot use the Docusign Envelope Status component. We have had to create another component on the opportunity record to list the related Docusign Statuses. The only way for users to Resend, Correct, or Void is to open the Docusign Status record from the related list and click the View Envelope button. They have to go into Docusign in order to access the features that used to be available directly in Salesforce. This is less user-friendly and more time consuming for our users.

1

C

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

L

legalcontractsConversation Starter

Collapsible messaging in Activity Feed of Agreement Desk RequestIdea Submitted

Please consider adding an option to make the email messages that appear in the Agreement Desk Activity Feed collapsible so that they can be expanded on request by the user. This feature would make the Activity Feed less busy and improve readability and tracking of the items being shown.

0

L

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

M

muslimamirovNewcomer

Biometric Human Authorship Attestation for Senders – Face ID / Fingerprint Confirmation Before Sending Sensitive Documents or emailDuplicate

In the era of widespread AI tools (LLM), there is growing concern in legal, compliance, and financial workflows about whether the content of an agreement, contract draft, or official correspondence was genuinely written and reviewed by a human — or largely generated by AI.Currently, DocuSign excels at verifying the recipient (signer) through biometric authentication, liveness detection, and ID verification. However, there is no equivalent mechanism for the sender/author to cryptographically attest that they personally created or reviewed the content before sending.Proposed Feature:Add an optional (or configurable per template/account) pre-send biometric attestation step for the sender:When the sender finishes editing a document/envelope (especially for high-stakes items like contracts, NDAs, payment instructions, legal correspondence, or compliance documents), they are prompted to confirm authorship with a quick on-device biometric check: Face ID, Touch ID / Fingerprint, or facial recognition with liveness detection. Upon successful confirmation, the system generates a cryptographically signed attestation (e.g., “Human Authored + Biometric Attestation”) containing: Hash of the document/content at the time of confirmation Timestamp Sender’s identity (linked to their verified account) Proof that a live human performed the biometric confirmation (without storing raw biometric data — using on-device secure enclave where possible) This attestation is embedded into the envelope as metadata, visible in the audit trail, and can be verified by the recipient or auditors.Key Benefits:Provides positive proof of human authorship in addition to existing AI content labeling. Strengthens non-repudiation and trust in sensitive communications. Helps organizations comply with emerging regulations (e.g., EU AI Act requirements for transparency on AI-generated content) by offering clear evidence that a real person stood behind the text. Low friction: the step can be enabled only for sensitive templates or high-value envelopes, taking just 2–3 seconds. Privacy-friendly: biometric processing happens on-device; only a cryptographic token is attached.This feature would complement DocuSign’s existing strong identity verification for signers and position DocuSign as a leader in trust and provenance for the entire agreement lifecycle — not just the signing moment.I believe this would be especially valuable for law firms, banks, corporate legal departments, and any organization dealing with regulated or high-risk documents.No compensation or recognition is requested — I simply want this idea to have a chance to live and be considered. I think I will purchase license to use it in my Outlook also :).

2

J

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

M

muslimamirovNewcomer

Biometric Human Authorship Attestation for Senders – Face ID / Fingerprint Confirmation Before Sending Sensitive Documents or emailIdea Submitted

In the era of widespread AI tools (LLM), there is growing concern in legal, compliance, and financial workflows about whether the content of an agreement, contract draft, or official correspondence was genuinely written and reviewed by a human — or largely generated by AI.Currently, DocuSign excels at verifying the recipient (signer) through biometric authentication, liveness detection, and ID verification. However, there is no equivalent mechanism for the sender/author to cryptographically attest that they personally created or reviewed the content before sending.Proposed Feature:Add an optional (or configurable per template/account) pre-send biometric attestation step for the sender:When the sender finishes editing a document/envelope (especially for high-stakes items like contracts, NDAs, payment instructions, legal correspondence, or compliance documents), they are prompted to confirm authorship with a quick on-device biometric check: Face ID, Touch ID / Fingerprint, or facial recognition with liveness detection. Upon successful confirmation, the system generates a cryptographically signed attestation (e.g., “Human Authored + Biometric Attestation”) containing: Hash of the document/content at the time of confirmation Timestamp Sender’s identity (linked to their verified account) Proof that a live human performed the biometric confirmation (without storing raw biometric data — using on-device secure enclave where possible) This attestation is embedded into the envelope as metadata, visible in the audit trail, and can be verified by the recipient or auditors.Key Benefits:Provides positive proof of human authorship in addition to existing AI content labeling. Strengthens non-repudiation and trust in sensitive communications. Helps organizations comply with emerging regulations (e.g., EU AI Act requirements for transparency on AI-generated content) by offering clear evidence that a real person stood behind the text. Low friction: the step can be enabled only for sensitive templates or high-value envelopes, taking just 2–3 seconds. Privacy-friendly: biometric processing happens on-device; only a cryptographic token is attached.This feature would complement DocuSign’s existing strong identity verification for signers and position DocuSign as a leader in trust and provenance for the entire agreement lifecycle — not just the signing moment.I believe this would be especially valuable for law firms, banks, corporate legal departments, and any organization dealing with regulated or high-risk documents.No compensation or recognition is requested — I simply want this idea to have a chance to live and be considered. I think I will purchase license to use it in my Outlook also :).

1

J

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

A

Artep6509New Voice

The width of the right side panel needs to be adjustable to allow viewing of file namesIdea Submitted

A typical DocuSign envelop (ie.: AGM processing) can contain quite large amount of documents, not just one or a few.In order to allow the user to review & self-check that all documents that have been included in an envelop actually have a signature pad positioned, the user needs to be able to identify and click through the file names successively as they appear in the right side panel.Currently, it is impossible to see more that 20-some caracters as the right side panel is very narrow and the width cannot be adjusted.This prevents the creator and reviewer from effectively and securely working through the list of files successively to ..position (copy/paste) the required signature pads in multipage documents. (Long contracts, financial statement, long minutes, etc..) review+check if all files have the “signature” pads correctly positioned before sending the envelope slow down the reviewer as it is impossible to see more of the file names. The width of the right side panel should be adjustable to at least triple of what it is today.Only showing the first 20-some caracters of file names is very insufficient to correctly identify which file precisely has been processed and/or reviewed.This negatively impacts the efficienty of the creator of the envelop and the reviewer.Thanks for considering an update to the right side panel and making it’s width adjustable.Krgds, Petra LAHR

0

A

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

N

NBKPRNewcomer

Webform Preview Next PageIdea Submitted

To Whom It May Concern: Please program the Webform Preview the ability to view all pages without having to fill in all the required information. When creating a webform and trying to preview page 2 and beyond, I am required to fill in the required information before proceeding which slows down the creative process.

0

N

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

M

momathewsonNewcomer

Verify or Download permissions for Users (Profile, Groups, Agreement Sets, etc)Idea Submitted

After configuring the permissions by User, Group, Agreement Set, etc -- it would be helpful to be able to verify the permission on an Agreement or User. “Who sees What” function. Download permissions to a CSV -- one user per line -- would be helpful. Ability to check an Agreement -- “Who can see/edit?” Thanks,Mike Mathewson

0

M

Forum|Forum|6 days ago

M

MschneiderNewcomer

Mark-Up Tool upgradesParked

Love the Idea of the Mark-up Tool but needs a few advancements.Line option - make available for recipients also (put the option under the comments option.) Move the Mark-up option (while in recipients hands) from the [Other Actions] button to under Add Comments icon. Currently if recipient adds Mark-up to document, next signer cannot visually see what was covered. Within the document, wherever there was a Mark-up added: add an Icon to the left of that Mark-up and add a feature where the next signer can click on that icon and the mark-up will briefly disappear. This will allow all parties to view the original language. While other parties can edit other people’s mark-ups, you can delete all, change and revise, however, you can only change or revise within the size of the original mark-up’s box size. Allow this to be resized. Require all signers to initial mark-up. Any Changes to mark-up, needs to be rerouted to all who have not seen. (similar to the collaborative option of text fields) Allow any user to reject just the Mark-up...or allow it to be deleted from another signer Allow SENDER to change mark-up formatting if they want, particularly Font Color.

3

M

Forum|Forum|7 days ago

K

KipPNewcomer

Bulk Send with Variable dataIdea Submitted

I know that a lot of users would benefit by being able to send out the same document to multiple recipients adding variable data to the document, like a mail merge. It would save hours upon hours of time.

2

K

Forum|Forum|7 days ago

J

JenIdeNewcomer

The Signature Tag must match the size of the signature appliedIdea Submitted

PLEASE please please update the signature tag to match the size of the signature applied. The suggested fix when someone else asked this was to adopt the signature size. That is NOT what I want. I want the current part 11 compliant signature to stay the same size and format. I just want the colored tags on the document to match that size! Too may people end up applying illegible signatures which brings into question the compliance aspect of the signature that is being paid extra for.

0

J

Forum|Forum|7 days ago

L

legalcontractsConversation Starter

Enhancement Request - Create an Add Note button in Agreement Desk Overview TabIdea Submitted

Please create an Add Note button in the Overview tab of an Agreement Desk Request. We need the ability to add general notes/status updates and have them appear in the Activity Feed. These notes don’t require action by or notice to specific people so the Send Message does not apply. Being required to Send Message to add a general note to the Activity Feed creates unnecessary steps, 1) drafting an email to yourself or shared mailbox, 2) opening and deleting the email from your inbox, and 3) clutters up the Activity Feed - when all we want to do is enter short notes providing updates. We have the ability to do this in our current tool so this feels like a step backward for us. This is another lacking feature that we did not see in a demo and did not have access to a sandbox to test prior to purchase. ia the Send Message button.

0

L

Forum|Forum|7 days ago